We are a delivery system, not a single role. We build baselines that enable control, not theater, then run an operating cadence that ties updates to field proofs and commercial guardrails. The result is predictive decisions, less waste, and fewer disputes. You get enterprise-grade controls at a cost that works for small and mid-sized contractors.

Discovery and data hygiene happen in days so we can trust the records. By the end of week two, dashboards and lookaheads are live with constraints removal in motion. Around week four, forecasting stabilizes with recovery windows visible, letting leadership act on facts rather than noise.

Both, with prevention first. We set up notices, contemporaneous records, and evidence standards that protect entitlement before disputes arise. If a claim is necessary, we build windows analyses and causation narratives grounded in baseline integrity and documented impacts, not guesswork.

It is designed for small and mid-sized contractors. We deliver enterprise-grade controls through standard playbooks and hands-on, principal-led delivery, so you get structure, clarity, and predictability without heavyweight overhead. The outcome is fewer surprises and better cash health at sustainable cost.

We typically use P6 or Microsoft Project for scheduling, cost ledgers for CBS and actuals, and a lightweight dashboard stack for reporting. We connect field apps and document systems so schedule, cost, cash, risk, and change talk to each other. The goal is one source of truth from site to C-suite.

We remove constraints before work starts, align interfaces between contracts, and track unit productivity so crews are never stranded. Materials are planned by need-by dates, storage and handling plans reduce damage, and plant is allocated by critical path to avoid idle time and blind costs.

Both. We prefer early on-site discovery to understand the actual constraints and cadence. Once the operating rhythm and dashboards are stable, remote support keeps costs efficient while audits and stage-gates maintain discipline and transparency for leadership.

We track SPI, CPI, TCPI, EAC date/cost, and variance drivers with trend lines and exception reports. For field effectiveness, we use lookahead completion and percent plan complete. For money, we monitor billing versus burn, retention, and change timing to protect working capital.

We tie progress to proofs, not opinions. Lookaheads include constraint lists that must be cleared before tasks start. Interfaces are tracked, and exceptions are documented. This removes optimistic bias and creates a predictable forecast path grounded in evidence.

Yes. We can connect to your stack or deploy a standard reporting layer. The key is governed data: master taxonomies, clean IDs, and consistent proofs. When the inputs are clean, the dashboards stop arguing with each other and leadership can finally trust the picture.

We run a change log with status gates, maintain notices and evidence, and build causation records that stand up to audit. Delay and disruption are analyzed against a clean baseline using windows, concurrency checks, and properly priced impact models that link to entitlement.

We align billing curves with burn rate, manage retention and change timing, and visualize exposures early. This keeps liquidity stable during ramp-up and variation cycles. Cash discipline is a control process, not a month-end miracle request to finance.

We use scenario-based coaching and structured handover sprints with practical templates. Capability assessments guide where to focus, and we embed routines so the cadence continues after handover. The point is independence, not dependency on us forever.

We build external predecessor maps, align permit and utility dates with the critical path, and integrate commissioning into the baseline. This prevents idle time, stranded plant, and the classic “waiting on someone else” excuse that kills productivity and morale.

Discovery is fixed-price with clear deliverables. Implementation can be milestone-based with acceptance criteria you can verify. We prefer transparent outcomes where you see progress and control exactly what you’re paying for at each step.

Reduction in waste, improved schedule reliability, healthier cash position, and fewer disputes. These are tracked with transparent KPIs, recovery windows, and audit-ready records. If it cannot be measured, it is not success; it is a story.

Minimal disruption. We overlay cadence and data hygiene on your existing workflows, then phase changes safely. Early wins come from constraint removal and evidence-based updates, not massive reorganizations that stall production.

Yes. We recover the baseline, rebuild logic where needed, and re-establish a trustworthy forecast path. The earlier we begin, the more options we have for recovery windows and commercial protection, but it’s never “too late” to restore control.

Method statements and safe sequences link directly to planned tasks, permits tie into lookaheads, and incidents feed lessons learned back into future planning. Productivity, safety, and quality should reinforce each other, not compete for attention.

You work directly with me as the principal on every engagement. For scopes that need extra hands or specialist coverage, I bring in vetted independent project-controls specialists — always directed and quality-checked by me personally, so accountability never changes hands.